Commons:Amministratura
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
Sta pàggina spiega lu rolu di l'amministratura (a li voti chiamati admins o sysops) nta Wikimedia Commons. Teni prisenti ca li dittagghi supra lu rolu e la manera ntâ quali sunnu numinati ponnu diffiriri di l'àutri siti.
Si si voli addumannari l'aiutu di n'amministraturi, scrìviri un post nta Administrators' noticeboard.
Ci sunnu attualmenti 186 amministratura nta Commons.
Cui è n'amministraturi?
Administrators as of nuvèmmiru 2023 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 186
If 186 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Chistioni tècnichi
L'amministratura sunnu utenti câ capacità tècnica nta Wikimedia Commons pi:
- Cancillari o ricupirari mmàggini e àutri file carricati, virificari e ripristinari li virsioni cancillati
- Cancillari o ricupirari pàggini, virificari e ripristinari li rivisioni cancillati
- Prutèggiri o livari la prutizzioni evintuali ê pàggini, canciari chiddi stissi pàggini ca foru prutiggiuti di àutri amministratura
- Bluccari o sbluccari l'utenzi di l'utenti, comu puru li nnirizzi IP ndividuali o la gamma di nnirizzi IP
- Canciari lu spazziu nomu
- Rinuminari li file
- Livari gruppi d'utenti (requests for rights)
- Cunfigurari campagni pô carricamentu cu prucidura guidata
- Cancillari e ripristinari vuci comu puru rivisiunari lu riggistru spicìficu di na pàggina
- Mpurtari pàggini di àutri wiki
- Uniri la crunuluggìa dê pàggini
- Canciari li filtri d'abbusu
- Nun criari rinnirizzamenti di pàggini quannu chisti hannu a èssiri spustati e canciati dô nomu origginali
- Gnurari li cuntrolli di spoofing e lu tìtulu, o lu nomu utenti dâ blacklist
- Mannari un missaggiu a chiù utenti e cuntimpuraniamenti (massmessage)
- Utilizzari li lìmiti chiù àuti pê ntirrugazzioni API
Chisti sunnu noti ntâ cullittività comu li strummenti di l'amministratura.
Rolu ntâ Cumunità
L'amministratura sunnu membri sperti e affidàbbili dâ cumunità Commons, li quali ntrapigghiaru un travagghiu di manutinzioni ultiriuri: a iddi foru affidati li strummenti d'amministraturi e hannu un pirmissu pùbblicu pi zocchi pò èssiri un votu/cunzenzu. Diversi amministratura hannu diffirenti àrii di ntiressi e cumpitenza, nunostanti ca li còmpiti tìpici di l'amministratura cumprènninu: la ditirminazzioni e cunchiusioni d'addumannati di cancillazzioni; la cancillazzioni di viulazzioni dô copyright; lu riprìstinu di file si avissi a èssiri nicissariu; la prutizzioni ntê cunfronti di Commons di parti di dd'utenzi ca dê sò canciamenti nni fannu mutivu di vannalismu; travagghiari ntê mudelli (usualmenti chiamati e canusciuti dô tèrmini templates), e àutri evintuali canciamenti ntê pàggini ca sunnu prutiggiuti. Naturalmenti, arcuni di sti còmpiti ponnu macari èssiri svolti di utenti nun-amministratura.
Si ci aspetta ca l'amministratura cumprènninu li scopi di stu pruggettu, e sunnu priparati a travagghiari custruttivamenti cu l'àutri pi sti fini. L'amministratura noltri avìssiru a cumprènniri e seguiri li pulìtichi di Commons, e unni apprupiatu rispittari la culliggialità dâ cumunità.
Oltri ô rolu c'addumanna l'usu dê strummenti d'amministrazzioni, l'amministratura nun pussèdinu auturità edituriali spiciali n virtù dâ sò pusizzioni, e ô nternu di discussioni e vutazzioni pùbblichi li sò cuntribbuti sunnu cunzidirati â stissa manera di n'utenti edituri nurmali. Naturalmenti arcuni amministratura hannu chiù nfluenza, ma chistu nun diriva tantu dâ sò pusizzioni quantu dâ fiducia ca guadagnaru ô nternu dâ cumunità.
Suggirimenti pi l'amministratura
Lèggiti Commons:Guide to adminship.
Livamentu dê privileggi d'amministraturi
Sicunnu la de-admin policy, li privileggi d'amministraturi ponnu èssiri rivucati pi nun attività o usu erratu dê strummenti. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Addumannata p'addivintari amministraturi
All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.
Comu prima cosa abbisogna jiri ntâ pàggina Amministraturi/Howto e liggìrisi li nfurmazzioni ca sunnu ripurtati ddà. Doppudichì si pò turnari ccà p'effittuari la vostra addumannata ntâ sizzioni suttastanti.
- After clicking the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) to transclude it. Request a watchlist notice at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, or edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice to put up one if you are an administrator.
- If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username: |
Voting
Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable you give reasons for both Support and Oppose votes as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.
Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Gnom
Gnom (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)
- Scheduled to end: 17:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for allowing me to put myself forward as an administrator.
As a media and IT lawyer from Hamburg, Germany, I have been a Wikipedian since 2005 and have been contributing to Commons since 2006/2007. Between 2014 and 2022, I was also a member of the board of Wikimedia Deutschland. Adding to my professional background, I was a legal fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation during the summer of 2013, and one of the privacy ombudspeople from 2014 until 2017. Over the years, I have been active on several Wikimedia projects in the field of copyright and personality rights – some of you may have seen me talk about these topics at Wikimanias and WikiCons, or in the copyright forum over at German-language Wikipedia. You may also have seen me file or contribute to occasional deletion requests on Commons, most of them relating to copyright-related issues.
My most relevant contribution as an administrator would probably be my experience around copyright law and personality rights, both from my 'day job' as well from my regular contributions in these areas a Wikimedian. Actually, my doctoral thesis on German and European copyright protection for works of applied art was inspired by a discussion on Wikipedia and Commons. Accordingly, you would certainly see most (if not all) of my activities as an administrator around legal questions relating to photos and other media on Commons.
In summary, I am hoping that while I may currently not be one of the most active users on Commons, my legal experience will prove useful to the Commons community. Thank you for considering my candidacy, and please let me know if you have any questions. I can respond in English, German, French, Italian, and Spanish. --Gnom (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Votes
- Support, no issues--Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose No recent activity in admin releated areas, not shown what admin rights are intended to be used for, and the mentioned intended activities don't require admin rights at all. --Krd 17:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be good if they had the mop. Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Copyright expertise will be valuable. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC).
- Oppose per Krd --Stepro (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose similar as Krd. Reading your CV, I also believe you might be a good admin for commons, but maybe you should also be editing a bit more. I'd likely support if you were to run after you've made some impact in the discussions around copyright.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
NeutralThe candidate makes a clear case for useful past experience but doesn't present any need for the tools. An expert on German copyright law would be quite useful on the copyright noticeboard or in related deletion discussions, but neither role requires admin rights. From Hill To Shore (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)- Changing to Support per answers below. From Hill To Shore (talk) 08:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral I agree with above commenters. Copyright expertise is valuable, undoubtedly, but you could first show your skills by participating in RFDs, requesting speedy deletions, reporting copyright violations, etc.. Had you started that way, I would have supported wholeheartedly. Bedivere (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Obviously a decent candidate but without real involvement in community/admin issues it is not possible for me to support sadly (looks like 4 DRs have been created in about 6 months). Herby talk thyme 08:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support looks ok, based on his activity including his recent participation in deletion requests.--RZuo (talk) 09:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Concerns with limited recent experience in admin-related areas -FASTILY 10:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Trusted user --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom and the answer at 08:46 below. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Edit count way too low after 17 years; you should have had at least 30K edits by now. 20 upper 13:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not trying to influence your opinion, but how do you come up with this number? Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- There are requirements that must be fulfilled if an editor genuinely wants to become an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. Every admin should have at least 10,000 edits. If an editor has edited on Wikimedia Commons for five years or fewer, 10,000 edits is a reasonable criterion. I would anticipate roughly 11–20K edits after 6–10 years, above 20K modifications after 11–15 years, and 30+K edits after 16–20 years. If you are serious about Wikimedia Commons, you should be able to meet those standards with ease. Even though I've only been on the site for a year, I've participated in more DRs than they have. They must establish a reputation in that field if they want to use their admin tools there. 20 upper 14:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not trying to influence your opinion, but how do you come up with this number? Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support I would like to have you as an admin here. We need everyone who is trustworthy and knows our policies and especially copyright laws. To address the concerns: If we make the requirements for new admins to high we will never get enough people so manage the huge workload. GPSLeo (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support per above, furthermore we have plenty of administrators who are less active than the candidate and maybe some of us are even less competent than the candidate. At best they will help, at worst I am sure that no irreparable harm will be done with the tools. Thank you for volunteering. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support looks competent to me, it's all that matters. – Ammarpad (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support no issues --Heitersberg (talk) 08:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Krd and others --DCB (talk) 10:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support LGTM —MdsShakil (talk) 10:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support, mostly per Christian Ferrer, very low activity in administrative areas but has good knowledge, I think they can be very helpful to the project, but I hope they will actually use the rights (as said in answer to my question) and don't just hold onto it. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose --Adamant1 (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Hinnerk11 (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support MZaplotnik(talk) 04:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Jaqen (talk) 08:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Lymantria (talk) 09:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- Question: In which administrative areas do you plan to work? -- CptViraj (talk) 04:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @CptViraj, thank you for your question. I am planning to help with deletion requests relating to copyright and personality rights – I also wrote about this above. Does this already answer your question, or is there anything else you would like to know? Gnom (talk) 08:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Responding to some comments above, here are some examples of my 'work' here on Commons.
- I regularly file and contribute to deletion requests relating to copyright. Here are some examples:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Alien sculptures (concerning copyright in fantasy models)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MAXXI (concerning freedom of panorama in Italy)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Comic Con Germany 2018 (book covers)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Opera in the Arena (Verona) (more freedom of panorama in Italy)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Kraftwerk concerts (concerning copyright in stage designs)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Exterior of the Reichstag dome (concerning freedom of panorama in Germany)
- I help answering questions on the German-language village pump .
- I recently helped writing the page Commons:AI-generated media, and have given three talks about legal issues relating to AI-created images in the German-language community.
- I started the "Wiki Loves Music" project, which has lead to the creation and upload of hundres of images relating to musical instruments, including two enwp featured pictures.
- Every year, I participate in Public Domain Day, and write about it on the WMF blog. Thank you again, --Gnom (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- I regularly file and contribute to deletion requests relating to copyright. Here are some examples:
Question You are sysop in test wiki, but you have made there only 1 edit. Why? Taivo (talk) 10:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Taivo, good question :-) – I just checked the log: I was made a sysop on the test wiki in 2014 by Nemo bis to learn about abuse filters in my capacity as privacy ombudsman. I then made my only edit on test wiki in 2017 when XanonymusX asked me to help with a music-related project. Is there anything else you would like to know? Gnom (talk) 10:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Question Earlier this year you added a comment to a closed deletion discussion and were reverted.[1] As you intend to do admin work in the deletion space, do you understand why you were reverted and how would you handle a similar situation in future? From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @From Hill To Shore, I should obviously have followed up with the closing admin on their talk page. (I should probably still do that, because there might actually still be an issue with the painting in that picture. @Reinhard Kraasch had initially fixed it, but now it is back.) Gnom (talk) 07:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- In this specific case (as an OTRS/VRT ticket is involved) I would advise going to Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard as the best option. However, contacting the closing admin directly is also valid as they should redirect you if they can't give an answer themselves. From Hill To Shore (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @From Hill To Shore: My thinking is that as far as I understand, in this case, it has already been clarified that the VRT ticket does not refer to the painting, so we do not have a release for the painting but only for the photograph itself. Gnom (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC))
- In this specific case (as an OTRS/VRT ticket is involved) I would advise going to Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard as the best option. However, contacting the closing admin directly is also valid as they should redirect you if they can't give an answer themselves. From Hill To Shore (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.